-----Original Message-----
From: David Thomson [mailto:idslayer@telus.net]
Sent: October 12, 2005 10:03 PM
To: P. Martin
Cc: Sun News Tips; rabble.ca; NewYorker TalkoftheTown; Newsroom Global Regina; letters@nytimes.com; Global BC News Tips; france-presse@un.int; Editorial Edmonton Journal; Editorial Calgary Herald; editor@telegraph.co.uk; attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca; Whan, Emma; Werner Schmidt MP; webmaster@colombiaemb.org; washington@embassy.mzv.cz; washington@diplobel.org; vietnamembassy@msn.com; usa@un.int; unitednationsoffice@ialana.org; uk@un.int; Transparency International Germany; Transparency International Belgium; ti-can@transparency.ca; The Honourable Maria Chaput, Senator; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; southernoffice@ialana.org; SHAVEK@SEN.PARL.GC.CA; sg@un.org; Senator Ross Fitzpatrick; rusun@un.int; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca; rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca; pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca; Paul Martin; pakistan@un.int; P D Martin; northernofficea@ialana.org; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca; Nancy Boswell; mjones@dfait-maeci.gc.ca; mission.korea-dpr@ties.itu.int; milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca; mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca; korinfo@koreaemb.org; kirbymjl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca; K Thompson; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca; ITSECOFF@ags.gov.au; Irwin Cotler - MP; info@rmiembassyus.org; info@kenyaembassy.com; india@un.int; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca; haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca; forrem@sen.parl.gc.ca; ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca; embassy@costarica.com; Darin Earl; D. Coderre - MP; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; Catherine S. Callbeck - Senator; CANADIAN RESOURCE CENTRE FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME; Canadian Police Association; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca; bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca; admin@ltembassyus.org; adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Activist newsHello all,Public-Private Partnerships are agreements that blend public money with private money, removing the public money from the public ledgers. Due to "3rd party (ie: the private partner) confidentiality", the money becomes exempt from public scrutiny, no longer accountable. As such P-3s are also an excellent vehicle for laundering the proceeds of other criminal activity.The following is an example of a public-private partnership, exposing to a much greater degree, the insidious, criminal nature of such agreements. Here, we have an example, literally sacrificing the health and well-being of children, in total defiance of the basic tenets of good governance - "for the safety and well-being of children and families".Yours very truly,Email circulated earlier:Childhood cancer has escalated by 25% in 25 years in Canada. There is a
photograph taken of
8 teen-age friends from the hamlet of Furdale south of Saskatoon. They were
at a School Fun Night. Three of these children were later diagnosed with
cancer. Two are now deceased. A 4th
friend (not in the picture) was diagnosed with cancer in summer 2004.
Health Canada WAS doing research. One of their main objectives was to
collect information on geographic region & cancer site of the patients. The
data from at least one of the Furdale children was targeted for inclusion
in the study. Guess what? the funding for the research was cut. There is
obviously no
"potential for commercialization".
The Government of Saskatchewan, through a vehicle called "the Health
Research Foundation, will use my money to fund research that has the
"potential for commercialization", research that will benefit the
pharmaceutical companies who won't then have to pay to develop their
bio-tech drugs. You want me to pay for it ... while the Governments stop
funding the research that will lead to a reversal in the numbers of children
that get cancer. (Canadian Childhood Cancer Surveillance and Control Program
(Health Canada) - because it addresses the CAUSES of the cancer, but has no
commercial value? ...
ANYTHING that has to do with
REMOVAL OF CAUSE does not have POTENTIAL FOR COMMERCIALIZATION. Meanwhile
the rate of childhood cancer in Canada has escalated by 25% in 25 years;
the trend will continue and escalate DUE TO A POLICY DECISION OF GOVERNMENT
TO PURSUE "PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS" AND CONCOMMITANT HEALTH RESEARCH
THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR COMMERCIALIZATION.
Aaach! There is a stream of expletives I would like to use. This is
criminal behaviour.
(Documentation of the fate of the Canadian Childhood Cancer Surveillance and
Control Program (Health Canada) was circulated earlier. Please ask me if
you would like any back emails.)
The research agenda for health is very much about funding biotech
(Pharmaceutical) - just like the changes that gutted the research at Ag
Canada research stations was about handing the seed sector over to
Transgenic/chemical transnational corporations (P3's - we can afford to hand
Over billions to these transnational corporations, but we cannot afford to
Fund the public research function). Have to have "matched funding" - so
It’s taxpayers that foot a large part of the bill for the development; the
regulatory function disappears. This is very serious stuff.
===================================
Email from:
Sandra Finley
306-373-8078
Saskatoon, SK
sabest1@sasktel.net